This is not true of the metadata name/value pairs being considered here. The existing file attributes are metadata because they affect file semantics in ways that must be enforced by the kernel (i.e. It combines photo-shooting date and file date changing along with a few unique tricks of its own. ![]() Treating it differently causes unnecessary headaches. A Better Finder Attributes is the ultimate file-tweaking tool for OS X. I downloaded ExifTool but feel lost as to how to do that. Don’t be sidetracked by the different names. I use 'A Better Finder Attributes 6' to do that exact same thing with pictures but it does not process video files for me. They are more appropriately implemented in user space as regular files. I’m all for standard configuration file formats shared by multiple applications but extended attributes unnecessarily complicate the kernel. serialising data and metadata through named pipes, shared file updates, file caching or file memory mapping), usually badly. grep), usually badly, and all the file system semantics have to be reengineered (e.g. file attributes and other factors related to system configuration and your. All the file system tools have to be reinvented (e.g. Intel Core i5-11400H Processor 2.7 GHz (12M Cache, up to 4.5 GHz, 6 Cores). Like the M$Windows registry it’s just another way of putting data into a ghetto where the standard file system tools can’t be used. Seriously, what does extended attributes give you that a configuration file with a standard format doesn’t? That’s why nobody bothers with them. Not to be pessimistic or anything, but this is the very sort of thing that developers have been very poor with in the past. A Better Finder Attributes vous propose de modifier à volonté les attributs dun fichier ou de plusieurs simultanément. Linux is likely to see some support for extended attributes, but nothing universal. If you’re writing portable code (Such as KDE or Gnome), you’re not going to be able to use those API’s. There is an additional problem that application developers face that the attributes API exists for Linux, but not for other OS’s E.g. the artist name is in an attribute called “Artist” and Xmms is looking for an attribute named “performer”? What good will it be to the user if the Vorbis file they’re playing in Xmms has all of the track information in a series of attributes if Xmms doesn’t know to read them? Or worse still, if E.g. Exercise: Add a tooltip to the paragraph below with the text About. ![]() Until some basic standards have been agreed upon, extended attributes and the additional useful meta-data that comes with them will be next to useless for the majority of users. This HTML tutorial also contains nearly 100 HTML exercises. The problem Linux will face will be getting everyone to agree on exactly what attributes to use and exactly how to use them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |